I just finished watching the movie Deadgirl and I really liked it. It was an original take on on the zombie/vampire genre. In this age of sequels and remakes it was refreshing to see something new.
That being said it was a pretty sick and twisted movie. If you like horror with a bit of social commentary check it out.
If you are looking for another movie that will challenge your perceptions of the horror genre you should also check out KatieBird *Certifiable Crazy Person.
Finally, another movie I saw recently but which you should avoid is Feed. Interesting concept on the serial killer sub-genre but totally ridiculous.
So I have been hearing for years that this was one of the hardest movies to watch, a real horror show as Alex DeLarge would say. Well I finally watched it tonight and thought it was totally tame and stupid. The actors are not convincing and the music is horrible. I just don't get what the big deal is.
I must be completely desensitized...wait, I am not the only one:
Movies that, for me, were harder to watch (but I still liked!):
One of my all time favorite "hard scifi" movies is 1974's Phase IV available on Amazon. What I mean by "hard scifi" is it only takes a little bit of suspension of disbelief to really think it could happen. Think Andromeda Strain or Colossus: The Forbin Project.
The movie starts out with a simple explanation that some astrological event happens and scientists wonder what will happen to the planet. Something small does happen instead of something big. Ants. Ants become more intelligent. They begin to behave differently. Two scientists are tasked with studying the problem using computers and crypto analysis.
The movie is filled with beautiful macro photography of ants working against the humans. Stuff like infiltrating the AC so the computers can only work at night. Bringing bits of poison to the queen so the next generation of ants is immune. And finally communicating using geometry!
My wife and I saw Thank you for smoking with some friends and it was really good - very funny. At the end your cheering for big tabacco - must see.
Well my wife and I saw the movie this morning and we both liked it. It followed the book well. The music was horrible though but it was easy to block out. The way Ron Howard filmed the flashbacks was really sweet - I think you'll see that style copied in the future. The book has a lot of speeches explaining different things to the reader and the movie did a great job with these.
In short the book was entertaining and the movie is too - go see it.
This weekend I had to watch 80's action movies so I went DVD shopping. I picked up
Well you might have noticed my book list on the right and see that I am reading the whole Harry Potter series back to back. I just recently finished Goblet of Fire and the movie came out today and was anxious to see it.
My first impression was that it was a Cliff notes version of the book. They cut so much out that it felt like the movie was on fast forward. I think it was better than the Prisoner of Azkaban though.
Lets see some of the things they left out (there are more but here are the highlights):
Riddle family murders
Potter at the Dursleys
Mr. Weasley "flooing" to pick up Potter and confronting Mr. Dursley
Winky the house elf
Percy Weasley (Weatherby)
Fred and George's bet
Who won the Quidditch World Cup game
Ministry of Magic protecting World Cup
Potter, Weasley, Malfoy's in box seats
Death Eaters attacking muggles
Weighing of the Wands
Potter resisting Imperio Curse
Bagman and the Goblins
S.P.E.W. and the House-Elf Liberation Front
Return of Dobby
Return of Sirius
The giant spider in the maze
Explanation of Priori Incantatem
Potter giving the Triwizard Cup winnings to Fred and George
Rita Skeeter being able to turn into a bug